TFuller
Senior Member
 Registered: 16-October-2009
Posts: 149
|
|
One simple rule for vanes.
<30" = 2D Vanes
>30" = 4D Vanes
Rather than having multiple entries in my pressure classes or having multiple elbow types with vane types locked, why can't we have just one simple rule?
_______________________________________
Thomas N Fuller II
Industrial Contractors, Inc.
FAB-MEP, CAD-MEP, CAM-Duct 2.40.blahblah, Lock 19
|
|
| 30-November-2009 14:31:16 |
|
Don
Senior Scheduler
 From: Bury, Manchester UK
Registered: 17-May-2004
Posts: 455
|
|
I guess because most people like to have their own rules 
_______________________________________
"And then one day you find, ten years have got behind you.
No one told you when to run, you missed the starting gun."
running PM2000 2.40.039 (19)
|
|
| 30-November-2009 14:41:35 |
|
TFuller
Senior Member
Registered: 16-October-2009
Posts: 149
|
|
Yes, I understand, but I was just wishing for aprogrammable length on vanes that would apply to whatever elbow I was on (i.e. narrow vs broad has same dims but different vane usage)
_______________________________________
Thomas N Fuller II
Industrial Contractors, Inc.
FAB-MEP, CAD-MEP, CAM-Duct 2.40.blahblah, Lock 19
|
|
| 30-November-2009 15:08:12 |
|
Don
Senior Scheduler
From: Bury, Manchester UK
Registered: 17-May-2004
Posts: 455
|
|
It could be done with Scripting if you have it enabled
_______________________________________
"And then one day you find, ten years have got behind you.
No one told you when to run, you missed the starting gun."
running PM2000 2.40.039 (19)
|
|
| 30-November-2009 16:19:40 |
|
cam-nav
Senior Member
 From: Seattle
Registered: 11-October-2006
Posts: 2839
|
|
Why don't you want multiple entries in your pressure classes? This would be what they are for correct? I must be missing something.
Don't take this wrong, just wondering why. Not trying to be a smartass either.
_______________________________________
Dave
W7 64 bit- Dell M6400
CAD-Duct v2.38.214
testing v2.40.052
|
|
| 30-November-2009 18:38:19 |
|
TFuller
Senior Member
Registered: 16-October-2009
Posts: 149
|
|
If I put in a rule in my PC about 48" LS 29" SS gets 2D vanes, this contradicts a narrow way elbow that would need 4D vanes because they're over 30."
I believe the logic is based on LS/SS, not cheek vs. depth.
_______________________________________
Thomas N Fuller II
Industrial Contractors, Inc.
FAB-MEP, CAD-MEP, CAM-Duct 2.40.blahblah, Lock 19
|
|
| 10-December-2009 16:29:42 |
|
VirtualPilot
Virtual Pilot
 From: Memphis, TN
Registered: 30-August-2006
Posts: 3422
|
|
I just simply would like to see 3D vanes in rectangular ducts the same way I can in Spiral Ducts....
_______________________________________
Santos Cedeno CAD/BIM Mgr - DIXIE Metal Products
REL 2.40.52 SP1 {19}
DELL T7500 - Dual Quad Core Xeon 2.26GHz - 6GB RAM - 1GB nVidia Quadro FX3800 - 80GB OS Drive - 320GB Data Drive - W7Ux64 - MEP2010 - NAVIS 2010
ALIENWARE M17-R1 - Core 2 Duo T9400 2.53GHz - 4GB RAM - 32GB Solid State OS Drive - 100GB Data Drive - (2) ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 - W7Px64 - MEP2010 - NAVIS 2010
|
|
| 10-December-2009 17:52:19 |
|
Jump to
|
Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002-2007 Rickard Andersson
|
|
